Putting The Student Debt “Lie” In Context

Over the past week the Tories have been hammering Labour for their apparent U-turn on student debt. Whilst we are all about making sure politicians are held to account over misleading statements and rhetoric, the “outrage” over the decision seems to be coming exclusively from the media and Conservative HQ, not from Labour voters. James O’Brien spent his radio show earlier this week trying to find anyone who supported and voted for Labour because of this supposed “promise”.

As we pointed out in our fact check last week on the issue, Labour didn’t include the issue in their manifesto, nor did they pledge to wipe out student debt. Rather, in a frequently misquoted NME interview, Corbyn acknowledged that the current system was broken and that Labour were looking into ways to alleviate or reduce that debt.

They admittedly didn’t include the policy proposal in their manifesto as they had little time to prepare the manifesto after Theresa May U-turned to call a snap election. So whilst Corbyn’s comments on tuition fees could be interpreted as misleading, only 17% of voters believed that Labour would write off student debt accrued during the past seven years since the increase to £9,000 annually. 

In light of the smear campaign, we felt it was necessary to put in context the extent to which Labour have divested from their manifesto in comparison to the Conservatives and other parties.

So here is the list of policies that the Conservatives have dropped since the election,

  • Dementia Tax
  • Scrapping the Triple Lock on pensions
  • Having a vote on fox hunting
  • Means testing the winter fuel allowance
  • Repealing the Fixed Term Parliament Act
  • Demand to agree Brexit divorce bill only after the future relationship had been defined
  • Energy Price Cap
  • The right for Northern Ireland to determine their own abortion laws
  • Scrapping free school lunches
  • Providing free school breakfasts
  • “No deal is better than a bad deal” (Although there still seems to be a few in the party who are sticking to this line)
  • Abolishing the admissions cap for religious schools (This is not 100% confirmed, although reports in the Sunday Times have suggested that the proposals are all but dead)
  • Bringing back grammar schools (The Queen’s speech only pledged to ensure “every child has the opportunity to attend a good school”)
  • Reducing net migration to “tens of thousands”, opting instead for a “new national policy on immigration”

The Conservatives are not the only party who have changed their tune post-election, Nicola Sturgeon and the SNP have walked back on their demands for a second referendum in the light of a somewhat reduced seat and vote share.

The point here is not to lambaste every political party for changing their policy positions, without evolution or compromise by political parties, we would never see any progress in government or society. Instead we want to simply highlight that the Conservatives have dropped more manifesto policies than would be expected of a newly elected government, so to attempt to tarnish Labour for an out of context quote seems incredibly hypocritical.

This negative and slanderous form of politics and rhetoric is an issue that many young voters have with the Conservative Party and this tactic seems to be just more of the same. Many Senior and backbench Tories expressed grave concerns about the age divide in the electorate, yet they are continuing to pedal the same politics of negativity. If they want to be taken as a credible electoral force by younger generations, they need to understand how negative campaigning has driven young voters towards Labour and if they fail to learn from the result of 2017 election, they are doomed to suffer further defeats.

If you enjoyed what you read here you can follow us on FacebookTwitter, and Instagram to keep up to date with everything we are covering, or sign up to our mailing list here!

[amazon_auto_links id=”1180″]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *